MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-06T11:22:26Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Knewcomer at 14:02, 16 August 2011

2011-08-16T14:02:02Z

New page

Attendance: 16+NOTE: I believe many folks joined whose names I did not capture. Let me know if your name is not here, and I'll be happy to add it.     Technical Team Report - Kate 
<ul><li>New draft of spec posted as of 8/10; no field changes, just editorial</li><li>Open issue on data license; need agreement between spec and RDF</li><li>Deadline for feedback by early am 8/15</li><li>Tools updated</li><li>New example available</li></ul>

Business Team Report - Kim
<ul><li>GA <ul><li>Press release shaping up; Kim reviewed list of names to be included</li><li>JimZ will mention in Keynote, Phil O. & Esteban R. have speaking slot</li><li>BOF session not yet on website; Thursday, 8/18 at 5:15 pm</li><li>SPDX booth staffing in progress; John Ellis working schedule; 1 pg handout will be available</li></ul></li><li>SPDX Website update<ul><li>Don't believe we'll be ready to cutover from sandbox to live site in time for launch</li><li>Kim will update Home page on live site in prep for launch</li><li>Kate will ensure spec is up to date on live site</li></ul></li><li>FAQs<ul><li>Asked all volunteers to get their contributions in by end of day Tuesday</li></ul></li></ul>

Legal Team Report - Rockett 
<ul><li>Circulated draft of revised trademark & compliance statements <ul><li>Deep discussion on this topic resulted in additional proposed changes</li><li>"Policing" policy concerns raised; recommendation is to follow LF policy of community notification</li><li>Concerns about requiring attribution/compliance statement inside SPDX file requiring change to spec</li><li>Decided that no attribution statement will be included in SPDX file at this time; we will revisit post 1.0 GA</li><li>Rockett has the action item to send final wording to Kate</li></ul></li><li>Data license discussion<ul><li>Some team members concerned that use of PDDL, even with language about side-agreement re confidentially may affect adoption of spec by those who are working with packages that contain proprietary code</li><li>Other team members believe that allowing data licenses other than PDDL will affect adoption by open source community</li><li>Noted that Karen Copenhaver discussed this use with the author of PDDL and we have agreement that this use is compliant with intent of license; current wording provided by Karen C. after review with author</li><li>Decided that v1.0 will stipulate PDDL as only license for data</li></ul></li></ul>Open Action Items
<ul><li>MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING</li><li>Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly</li><li>Michael H. -- Posting BOM info</li></ul>

Attendees<ul class="ul1"><li class="li2">Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Kamak Hassin, Protecode</li><li class="li2">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Peter Williams, Open Logic</li><li class="li2">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li>Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li>Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic</li><li>Esteban Rockett, Motorola</li><li>Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li><li>Adam , Cisco</li><li>Mark Gisi, Wind River</li><li>Branden Robinson, Cisco</li><li>Jack Manbeck, TI</li><li>Steve Cropper, Cisco</li></ul>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<p>Attendance: 16+</p><p>NOTE: I believe many folks joined whose names I did not capture. Let me know if your name is not here, and I'll be happy to add it. </p><p> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><strong>Technical Team Report - Kate<br /></strong></p>
+* Attendance: 16+
-<ul><li>New draft of spec posted as of 8/10; no field changes, just editorial</li><li>Open issue on data license; need agreement between spec and RDF</li><li>Deadline for feedback by early am 8/15</li><li>Tools updated</li><li>New example available</li></ul>
+* NOTE: I believe many folks joined whose names I did not capture. Let me know if your name is not here, and I'll be happy to add it.
-<p><strong>Business Team Report - Kim</strong></p>
+== Technical Team Report - Kate ==
-<ul><li>GA <br /><ul><li>Press release shaping up; Kim reviewed list of names to be included</li><li>JimZ will mention in Keynote, Phil O. &amp; Esteban R. have speaking slot</li><li>BOF session not yet on website; Thursday, 8/18 at 5:15 pm</li><li>SPDX booth staffing in progress; John Ellis working schedule; 1 pg handout will be available</li></ul></li><li>SPDX Website update<ul><li>Don't believe we'll be ready to cutover from sandbox to live site in time for launch</li><li>Kim will update Home page on live site in prep for launch</li><li>Kate will ensure spec is up to date on live site</li></ul></li><li>FAQs<ul><li>Asked all volunteers to get their contributions in by end of day Tuesday</li></ul></li></ul>
-<p><strong>Legal Team Report - Rockett<br /></strong></p>
+* New draft of spec posted as of 8/10; no field changes, just editorial
-<ul><li>Circulated draft of revised trademark &amp; compliance statements<br /><ul><li>Deep discussion on this topic resulted in additional proposed changes</li><li>"Policing" policy concerns raised; recommendation is to follow LF policy of community notification</li><li>Concerns about requiring attribution/compliance statement inside SPDX file requiring change to spec</li><li>Decided that no attribution statement will be included in SPDX file at this time; we will revisit post 1.0 GA</li><li>Rockett has the action item to send final wording to Kate</li></ul></li><li>Data license discussion<ul><li>Some team members concerned that use of PDDL, even with language about side-agreement re confidentially may affect adoption of spec by those who are working with packages that contain proprietary code</li><li>Other team members believe that allowing data licenses other than PDDL will affect adoption by open source community</li><li>Noted that Karen Copenhaver discussed this use with the author of PDDL and we have agreement that this use is compliant with intent of license; current wording provided by Karen C. after review with author</li><li>Decided that v1.0 will stipulate PDDL as only license for data</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Open Action Items</strong></p>
+* Open issue on data license; need agreement between spec and RDF
-<ul><li>MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING</li><li>Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly</li><li>Michael H. -- Posting BOM info</li></ul>
+* Deadline for feedback by early am 8/15
-<p class="p1"><strong>Attendees</strong></p><ul class="ul1"><li class="li2">Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Kamak Hassin, Protecode</li><li class="li2">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Peter Williams, Open Logic</li><li class="li2">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li>Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li>Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic</li><li>Esteban Rockett, Motorola</li><li>Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li><li>Adam , Cisco</li><li>Mark Gisi, Wind River</li><li>Branden Robinson, Cisco</li><li>Jack Manbeck, TI</li><li>Steve Cropper, Cisco</li></ul>
+== Business Team Report - Kim ==

General Meeting/Minutes/2011-08-11 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Knewcomer at 14:02, 16 August 2011