General Meeting/Minutes/2011-06-16 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-06T11:23:29Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Jnweiger at 21:56, 29 June 2011

2011-06-29T21:56:23Z

Knewcomer at 19:57, 23 June 2011

2011-06-23T19:57:57Z

New page

Attendance: 11 Minutes for 20110602 approved      Technical Team Report - Kate <ul><li>Tools: Updating tools as needed</li><li>Spec: Working minor changes to June 5 version of the spec</li><li>Spec: Have had interesting discussions with Cisco about mapping SPDX to their current process. Expect that new fields and possibly new models will come out of this discussion</li><li>Beta feedback: Looking for place to collect/present feedback. Would like to be sure we capture feedback even for items we've resolved. Kim plans to create wiki page.</li></ul>

Business Team Report - Kim
<ul><li>Beta program: <ul><li>HP/WindRiver & OL/Antelink continue to make progress</li><li>Motorola/TI progress is not yet clear</li><li>There's been some confusion over license fields at package level. A wiki discussion on this topic can be found here: http://spdx.org/wiki/license-field-discussion</li></ul></li><li>GA Launch:<ul><li>Continue to work to get ready for launch at LinuxCon NA in mid-August</li></ul></li></ul>

Legal Team Report - In absentia 
<ul><li>All legal team members are at a separate face-to-face meeting and unable to attend this meeting</li></ul>

Cross Functional Issues – Discussion
<ul><li>Website update- Kirsten
<ul><li>Working on mind-maps for proposed flow; plan to present more generally in next few weeks</li><li>Logistical question from Kim: should we remove or archive older content? <ul><li>Both options are available; deleting won't create orphaned pages</li><li>Will likely decide on case-by-case basis</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>Package License fields - Postponed until next meeting since legal team not present this week</li></ul>

Open Action Items
<ul><li>MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING</li><li>Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly</li><li>Michael H. -- provide info on existing BOM standards that should be useful for future consideration</li><li>Legal/Biz Teams- Review and update Master Schedule</li><li>?? -- volunteers needed to review and update the FAQ: <a title="http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq" href="wiki/draft-spdx-faq">http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq</a></li></ul>Attendees
<ul class="ul1"><li class="li2">Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Peter Williams, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Bill Schineller, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li>Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li>Brandon Robinson, Cisco</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li><li>Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation</li><li>Juergan Weigert, SuSE</li></ul>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<p>Attendance: 11<br />Minutes for 20110602 approved<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><strong>Technical Team Report - Kate<br /></strong></p><ul><li>Tools: Updating tools as needed</li><li>Spec: Working minor changes to June 5 version of the spec</li><li>Spec: Have had interesting discussions with Cisco about mapping SPDX to their current process. Expect that new fields and possibly new models will come out of this discussion</li><li>Beta feedback: Looking for place to collect/present feedback. Would like to be sure we capture feedback even for items we've resolved. Kim plans to create wiki page.</li></ul>
+* Attendance: 11
-<p><strong>Business Team Report - Kim</strong></p>
+== Technical Team Report - Kate ==
-<ul><li>Beta program:<br /><ul><li>HP/WindRiver &amp; OL/Antelink continue to make progress</li><li>Motorola/TI progress is not yet clear</li><li>There's been some confusion over license fields at package level. A wiki discussion on this topic can be found here: http://spdx.org/wiki/license-field-discussion</li></ul></li><li>GA Launch:<ul><li>Continue to work to get ready for launch at LinuxCon NA in mid-August</li></ul></li></ul>
-<p><strong>Legal Team Report - In absentia<br /></strong></p>
+* Tools: Updating tools as needed
-<ul><li>All legal team members are at a separate face-to-face meeting and unable to attend this meeting</li></ul>
+* Spec: Working minor changes to June 5 version of the spec
-<p><strong>Cross Functional Issues – Discussion</strong></p>
+== Business Team Report - Kim ==
-<ul><li>Website update- Kirsten
-<ul><li>Working on mind-maps for proposed flow; plan to present more generally in next few weeks</li><li>Logistical question from Kim: should we remove or archive older content? <br /><ul><li>Both options are available; deleting won't create orphaned pages</li><li>Will likely decide on case-by-case basis</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>Package License fields - Postponed until next meeting since legal team not present this week</li></ul>
-<p><strong>Open Action Items</strong></p>
+* Beta program:
-<ul><li>MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING</li><li>Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly</li><li>Michael H. -- provide info on existing BOM standards that should be useful for future consideration</li><li>Legal/Biz Teams- Review and update Master Schedule</li><li>?? -- volunteers needed to review and update the FAQ: <a title="http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq" href="wiki/draft-spdx-faq">http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq</a></li></ul><p class="p1"><strong>Attendees</strong></p>
+** HP/WindRiver &amp; OL/Antelink continue to make progress
-<ul class="ul1"><li class="li2">Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Peter Williams, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Bill Schineller, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li>Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li>Brandon Robinson, Cisco</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li><li>Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation</li><li>Juergen Weigert, SuSE</li></ul>
+** Motorola/TI progress is not yet clear

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 <p><strong>Open Action Items</strong></p>
 <ul><li>MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING</li><li>Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly</li><li>Michael H. -- provide info on existing BOM standards that should be useful for future consideration</li><li>Legal/Biz Teams- Review and update Master Schedule</li><li>?? -- volunteers needed to review and update the FAQ: <a title="http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq" href="wiki/draft-spdx-faq">http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq</a></li></ul><p class="p1"><strong>Attendees</strong></p>
-<ul class="ul1"><li class="li2">Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Peter Williams, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Bill Schineller, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li>Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li>Brandon Robinson, Cisco</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li><li>Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation</li><li>Juergan Weigert, SuSE</li></ul>
+<ul class="ul1"><li class="li2">Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Peter Williams, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Bill Schineller, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li>Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li>Brandon Robinson, Cisco</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li><li>Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation</li><li>Juergen Weigert, SuSE</li></ul>