General Meeting/Minutes/2011-06-02 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-06T11:42:57Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Knewcomer at 20:05, 3 June 2011

2011-06-03T20:05:59Z

New page

Attendance: 13 Minutes for 20110519 approved      Technical Team Report - Gary<ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Tools: have received good feedback; addressed a few technical issues; available for beta use</li><li>Spec: final polishing has been largely completed; waiting for one more review from legal which is expected by Friday am PT</li></ul>Business Team Report - Kim<ul style="text-align: left;"><li>3 beta teams are working; target for beta completion & feedback is end of June; request that all teams work toward this date <ul><li>HP/WindRiver & OL/Antelink are in progress</li><li>Kickoff for Motorola/TI still to be scheduled, but there's been activity. Rockett will work with Gary to get kickoff scheduled</li></ul></li><li>Website refresh subteam has been created. Details on this working group can be found here: <ul><li>http://spdx.org/wiki/website-refresh</li></ul></li><li>GA launch process is next big thing to focus on<ul><li>Planned for LinuxCon in Vancouver</li><li>Phil O. has a speaking slot</li><li>Goal include press release and mention in keynote</li></ul></li></ul>Legal Team Report - Rockett<ul style="text-align: left;"><li>Last scrub on 5/16 spec in progress. Final comments due by Friday am PT time, 6/3</li><li>Recommend Open Data Commons PDDL license for SPDX MetaData (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/); will send link to broader group for final sign-off</li><li>License templatizing is the next big focus</li><li>Also noted that we'll need a process for adding licenses to SPDX list very soon; Kim says Biz Team has a proposal for a process and she'll plan to share more broadly</li></ul>Cross Functional Issues – Discussion<ul><li>Website update- Steve<ul><li>Sandbox for testing new website structure in place</li><li>Team plans to create storyboards for 3-4 personas using mind map tools</li><li>wiki pages for working grou now available http://spdx.org/wiki/website-refresh</li></ul></li><li>Questions/recommendations for presenting data for binaries and archives such as jar files -- Kim<ul><li>There's been recent email about how to represent data for binaries that are combinations of OSS, 3rd party, and proprietary code in SPDX documents</li><li>Issue has also come up for OL/Antelink beta partners; OL/Antelink have decided to use compound licensing for jar files when needed; should we recommend the same approach for binaries?</li><li>There was a lively discussion on this topic with input from Steve Cropper, Kim Weins, Michael Herzog, Kate Stewart</li><li>Main conclusion: Recommendations for how to handle these use cases need to be added to the draft FAQ <ul><li>Draft FAQ is available here: http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq</li><li>FAQ should address questions about proprietary and 3rd party as well as OSS licenses</li><li>Kim added a number of topics to the FAQ; need volunteers to provide additional info on these topics</li></ul></li><li>A side issue regarding how best to connect package and SPDX document was also discussed</li><li>The topic of package hierarchy also came up <ul><li>Michael H. noted that the SPDX team made a conscious choice not to tackle this for v1 of the specification</li><li>v1 spec is intended to address lower level or sub-assembly items and a BOM is not yet represented in the spec</li><li>Recommended that a section on items specifically deferred be added to the FAQ so that new users have visibility into these decisions</li><li>Michael also volunteered to pull together info on well traveled routes for BOMs that we might want to leverage    </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul> Open Action Items<ul><li>MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING</li><li>Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly</li><li>Michael H. -- provide info on existing BOM standards that should be useful for future consideration</li><li>Legal/Biz Teams- Review and update Master Schedule</li><li>?? -- volunteers needed to review and update the FAQ: http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq</li></ul>Closed Action Items<ul><li>Kirsten- Notify Kim of need to clean up business section of website.</li><li>MartinM- Get master list of website pages to Kate</li></ul>Attendees<ul class="ul1"><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">Kamal Hassin, Protecode</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">Esteban Rockett, Motorola</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">Michael Herzog, NexB</li><li style="text-align: left;">Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li style="text-align: left;">Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li style="text-align: left;">Peter Williams, OpenLogic</li><li style="text-align: left;">Jillayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic</li><li style="text-align: left;">Brandon Robinson, Cisco</li><li style="text-align: left;">Steve Cropper, Cisco</li><li style="text-align: left;">Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li></ul>

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 6 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p style="text-align: left;">~~Attendance: 13~~<br />~~Minutes for 20110519 approved~~<br />     <br /><strong>~~Technical Team Report - Gary~~</strong></p><ul style~~=~~"text-align: left;"><li>~~Tools: have received good feedback; addressed a few technical issues; available for beta use~~</li><li>~~Spec: final polishing has been largely completed; waiting for one more review from legal which is expected by Friday am PT~~</li></ul><p style~~=~~"text-align: left;"><strong>~~Business Team Report - Kim~~</strong></p><ul style~~=~~"text-align: left;"><li>~~3 beta teams are working; target for beta completion & feedback is end of June; request that all teams work toward this date~~<br /><ul><li>~~HP/WindRiver & OL/Antelink are in progress~~</li><li>~~Kickoff for Motorola/TI still to be scheduled, but there's been activity. Rockett will work with Gary to get kickoff scheduled~~</li></ul></li><li>~~Website refresh subteam has been created. Details on this working group can be found here: ~~<br~~ /~~><ul><li>http://spdx.org/wiki/website-refresh</li></ul></li><li>~~GA launch process is next big thing to focus on~~<ul><li>~~Planned for LinuxCon in Vancouver~~</li><li>~~Phil O. has a speaking slot~~</li><li>~~Goal include press release and mention in keynote~~</li></ul></li></ul><p style~~=~~"text-align: left;"><strong>~~Legal Team Report - Rockett~~</strong></p><ul style~~=~~"text-align: left;"><li>~~Last scrub on 5/16 spec in progress. Final comments due by Friday am PT time, 6/3~~</li><li>~~Recommend Open Data Commons PDDL license for SPDX MetaData (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/); will send link to broader group for final sign-off~~</li><li>~~License templatizing is the next big focus~~</li><li>~~Also noted that we'll need a process for adding licenses to SPDX list very soon; Kim says Biz Team has a proposal for a process and she'll plan to share more broadly~~</li></ul><p style~~=~~"text-align: left;"><strong>~~Cross Functional Issues – Discussion~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~Website update- Steve~~<ul><li>~~Sandbox for testing new website structure in place~~</li><li>~~Team plans to create storyboards for 3-4 personas using mind map tools~~</li><li>~~wiki pages for working ~~grou~~ now available ~~http://spdx.org/wiki/website-refresh</li></ul><~~/~~li><li>~~Questions/recommendations for presenting data for binaries and archives such as jar files -- Kim~~<ul><li>~~There's been recent email about how to represent data for binaries that are combinations of OSS, 3rd party, and proprietary code in SPDX documents~~</li><li>~~Issue has also come up for OL/Antelink beta partners; OL/Antelink have decided to use compound licensing for jar files when needed; should we recommend the same approach for binaries?~~</li><li>~~There was a lively discussion on this topic with input from Steve Cropper, Kim Weins, Michael Herzog, Kate Stewart~~</li><li>~~Main conclusion: Recommendations for how to handle these use cases need to be added to the draft FAQ ~~<br /><ul><li>~~Draft FAQ is available here: ~~http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq</li><li>~~FAQ should address questions about proprietary and 3rd party as well as OSS licenses~~</li><li>~~Kim added a number of topics to the FAQ; need volunteers to provide additional info on these topics~~</li></ul></li><li>~~A side issue regarding how best to connect package and SPDX document was also discussed~~</li><li>~~The topic of package hierarchy also came up~~<br /><ul><li>~~Michael H. noted that the SPDX team made a conscious choice not to tackle this for v1 of the specification~~</li><li>~~v1 spec is intended to address lower level or sub-assembly items and a BOM is not yet represented in the spec~~</li><li>~~Recommended that a section on items specifically deferred be added to the FAQ so that new users have visibility into these decisions~~</li><li>~~Michael also volunteered to pull together info on well traveled routes for BOMs that we might want to leverage~~    </li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p style~~=~~"text-align: left;"><br /><strong>~~Open Action Items~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING~~</li><li>~~Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly~~</li><li>~~Michael H. -- provide info on existing BOM standards that should be useful for future consideration~~</li><li>~~Legal/Biz Teams- Review and update Master Schedule~~</li><li>~~?? -- volunteers needed to review and update the FAQ: ~~http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq</li></ul><p style~~=~~"text-align: left;"><strong>~~Closed Action Items~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~Kirsten- Notify Kim of need to clean up business section of website.~~</li><li>~~MartinM- Get master list of website pages to Kate~~</li></ul><p class~~=~~"p1" style~~=~~"text-align: left;"><strong>~~Attendees~~</strong></p><ul class~~=~~"ul1"><li class~~=~~"li2" style="text-align: left;">~~Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software~~</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">~~Kamal Hassin, Protecode~~</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">~~Kim Weins, OpenLogic~~</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">~~Esteban Rockett, Motorola~~</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">~~Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor~~</li><li class="li2" style="text-align: left;">~~Michael Herzog, NexB~~</li><li style="text-align: left;">~~Martin Michlmayr, HP~~</li><li style="text-align: left;">~~Kate Stewart, Canonical~~</li><li style="text-align: left;">~~Peter Williams, OpenLogic~~</li><li style="text-align: left;">~~Jillayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic~~</li><li style="text-align: left;">~~Brandon Robinson, Cisco~~</li><li style="text-align: left;">~~Steve Cropper, Cisco~~</li><li style="text-align: left;">~~Tom Incorvia, Microfocus~~</li></ul>~~	+	* Attendance: 13
		+	* Minutes for 20110519 approved
		+
		+	== Technical Team Report - Gary ==
		+
		+	* Tools: have received good feedback; addressed a few technical issues; available for beta use
		+	* Spec: final polishing has been largely completed; waiting for one more review from legal which is expected by Friday am PT
		+
		+	== Business Team Report - Kim ==
		+
		+	* 3 beta teams are working; target for beta completion & feedback is end of June; request that all teams work toward this date
		+	** HP/WindRiver & OL/Antelink are in progress
		+	** Kickoff for Motorola/TI still to be scheduled, but there's been activity. Rockett will work with Gary to get kickoff scheduled
		+	* Website refresh subteam has been created. Details on this working group can be found here:
		+	** [[Old/Website_Refresh]]
		+	* GA launch process is next big thing to focus on
		+	** Planned for LinuxCon in Vancouver
		+	** Phil O. has a speaking slot
		+	** Goal include press release and mention in keynote
		+
		+	== Legal Team Report - Rockett ==
		+
		+	* Last scrub on 5/16 spec in progress. Final comments due by Friday am PT time, 6/3
		+	* Recommend Open Data Commons PDDL license for SPDX MetaData (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/); will send link to broader group for final sign-off
		+	* License templatizing is the next big focus
		+	* Also noted that we'll need a process for adding licenses to SPDX list very soon; Kim says Biz Team has a proposal for a process and she'll plan to share more broadly
		+
		+	== Cross Functional Issues – Discussion ==
		+
		+	* Website update- Steve
		+	** Sandbox for testing new website structure in place
		+	** Team plans to create storyboards for 3-4 personas using mind map tools
		+	** wiki pages for working group now available [[Old/Website_Refresh]]
		+	* Questions/recommendations for presenting data for binaries and archives such as jar files -- Kim
		+	** There's been recent email about how to represent data for binaries that are combinations of OSS, 3rd party, and proprietary code in SPDX documents
		+	** Issue has also come up for OL/Antelink beta partners; OL/Antelink have decided to use compound licensing for jar files when needed; should we recommend the same approach for binaries?
		+	** There was a lively discussion on this topic with input from Steve Cropper, Kim Weins, Michael Herzog, Kate Stewart
		+	** Main conclusion: Recommendations for how to handle these use cases need to be added to the draft FAQ
		+	*** Draft FAQ is available here: [[SPDX_FAQ]]
		+	*** FAQ should address questions about proprietary and 3rd party as well as OSS licenses
		+	*** Kim added a number of topics to the FAQ; need volunteers to provide additional info on these topics
		+	** A side issue regarding how best to connect package and SPDX document was also discussed
		+	** The topic of package hierarchy also came up
		+	*** Michael H. noted that the SPDX team made a conscious choice not to tackle this for v1 of the specification
		+	*** v1 spec is intended to address lower level or sub-assembly items and a BOM is not yet represented in the spec
		+	*** Recommended that a section on items specifically deferred be added to the FAQ so that new users have visibility into these decisions
		+	*** Michael also volunteered to pull together info on well traveled routes for BOMs that we might want to leverage
		+
		+	== Open Action Items ==
		+
		+	* MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING
		+	* Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly
		+	* Michael H. -- provide info on existing BOM standards that should be useful for future consideration
		+	* Legal/Biz Teams- Review and update Master Schedule
		+	* ?? -- volunteers needed to review and update the FAQ: [[SPDX_FAQ]]
		+
		+	== Closed Action Items ==
		+
		+	* Kirsten- Notify Kim of need to clean up business section of website.
		+	* MartinM- Get master list of website pages to Kate
		+
		+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software
		+	* Kamal Hassin, Protecode
		+	* Kim Weins, OpenLogic
		+	* Esteban Rockett, Motorola
		+	* Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor
		+	* Michael Herzog, NexB
		+	* Martin Michlmayr, HP
		+	* Kate Stewart, Canonical
		+	* Peter Williams, OpenLogic
		+	* Jillayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic
		+	* Brandon Robinson, Cisco
		+	* Steve Cropper, Cisco
		+	* Tom Incorvia, Microfocus
		+
		+	[[Category:General\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]