Business Team/Minutes/2013-03-07 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-22T08:27:33Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

MartinMichlmayr: typo fix

2013-03-22T08:26:16Z

typo fix

JackM at 21:23, 13 March 2013

2013-03-13T21:23:12Z

JackM at 21:22, 13 March 2013

2013-03-13T21:22:53Z

JackM at 21:22, 13 March 2013

2013-03-13T21:22:34Z

JackM at 21:22, 13 March 2013

2013-03-13T21:22:00Z

JackM at 21:20, 13 March 2013

2013-03-13T21:20:15Z

JackM at 21:19, 13 March 2013

2013-03-13T21:19:47Z

JackM at 19:28, 13 March 2013

2013-03-13T19:28:52Z

JackM at 18:31, 13 March 2013

2013-03-13T18:31:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 22 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p><strong>~~Attendees~~</strong></p><p>~~Jack Manbeck~~</p><p>Mark Gisi</p><p>~~Gary O'Neall~~</p><p>~~Phil Odence~~</p><p> </p><p><strong>~~Agenda / Notes~~</strong></p><p><strong><br /></strong></p><p>~~We discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. It was proposed to concentrate on the following:~~<br /><br />1.     ~~ Gathering input on SPDX~~<br /><br />2.     ~~ Creation of white papers/guidelines on Consuming and Producing SPDX license information.~~<br /><br /> <br />~~Gathering Input on SPDX~~<br /><br />~~It was discussed that we do get feedback on SPDX but have never collected it and turned it into actionable requirements in some cases (e.g. data collected from sessions held at the LF Compliance Summit, etc). It would be good for the business team to become the focal point for collecting this type of feedback, cataloguing it and then passing it on to the appropriate teams to look into. The thinking is that the information would be from anonymous sources (unless otherwise stated).~~ ~~ Potential sources of information could be surveys, feedback sessions held at conferences and so forth. It would not be information collected in team meetings.~~ ~~ We need an owner to take on cataloguing the information. Gary and Phil volunteered to set up a survey.~~ ~~ The thinking is that we could disseminate the survey at the Collaboration Summit (Jack volunteered to make up business size cards to hand out), talk to the LF about disseminating to members and other possible avenues.~~<br /><br /> <br />~~Creation of Whitepapers~~<br /><br />~~We discussed the creation of a consumers and producers guide to SPDX. Seems these are sorely missing and would help people better understand SPDX. They could start as white papers and then evolve. It was also discussed whether an umbrella document on the benefits of SPDX to sit over those would be helpful as well. Seems like it.~~ ~~ Mark Gisi was going to check on whether he could contribute something to that. Need to find owners for the consumer and producers guide to get them written.~~<br /><br /> <br />~~Other Business~~<br /><br />~~In addition to discussing the priorities we talked about having an Educational class on SPDX at the collaboration summit. Mark Gisi took an action to look into creation of a session. Would be slotted for 4:30 on Tuesday at the Summit and a chance for people to come in and learn about SPDX and/or share information on experiences.~~<br /><br /> <strong><br /></strong></p>~~	+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Jack Manbeck
		+	* Mrk Gisis
		+	* Gary O'Neall
		+	* Phil Odence
		+
		+	== Agenda / Notes ==
		+
		+	We discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. It was proposed to concentrate on the following:
		+
		+	# Gathering input on SPDX
		+	# Creation of white papers/guidelines on Consuming and Producing SPDX license information.
		+
		+	== Gathering Input on SPDX ==
		+
		+	It was discussed that we do get feedback on SPDX but have never collected it and turned it into actionable requirements in some cases (e.g. data collected from sessions held at the LF Compliance Summit, etc). It would be good for the business team to become the focal point for collecting this type of feedback, cataloguing it and then passing it on to the appropriate teams to look into. The thinking is that the information would be from anonymous sources (unless otherwise stated). Potential sources of information could be surveys, feedback sessions held at conferences and so forth. It would not be information collected in team meetings. We need an owner to take on cataloguing the information. Gary and Phil volunteered to set up a survey. The thinking is that we could disseminate the survey at the Collaboration Summit (Jack volunteered to make up business size cards to hand out), talk to the LF about disseminating to members and other possible avenues.
		+
		+	== Creation of Whitepapers ==
		+
		+	We discussed the creation of a consumers and producers guide to SPDX. Seems these are sorely missing and would help people better understand SPDX. They could start as white papers and then evolve. It was also discussed whether an umbrella document on the benefits of SPDX to sit over those would be helpful as well. Seems like it. Mark Gisi was going to check on whether he could contribute something to that. Need to find owners for the consumer and producers guide to get them written.
		+
		+	== Other Business ==
		+
		+	In addition to discussing the priorities we talked about having an Educational class on SPDX at the collaboration summit. Mark Gisi took an action to look into creation of a session. Would be slotted for 4:30 on Tuesday at the Summit and a chance for people to come in and learn about SPDX and/or share information on experiences.
		+
		+	[[Category:Business\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:26, 22 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>~~Mrk Gisis~~</p><p>Gary O'Neall</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p><strong><br /></strong></p><p>We discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. It was proposed to concentrate on the following:<br /><br />1.      Gathering input on SPDX<br /><br />2.      Creation of white papers/guidelines on Consuming and Producing SPDX license information.<br /><br /> <br />Gathering Input on SPDX<br /><br />It was discussed that we do get feedback on SPDX but have never collected it and turned it into actionable requirements in some cases (e.g. data collected from sessions held at the LF Compliance Summit, etc). It would be good for the business team to become the focal point for collecting this type of feedback, cataloguing it and then passing it on to the appropriate teams to look into. The thinking is that the information would be from anonymous sources (unless otherwise stated).  Potential sources of information could be surveys, feedback sessions held at conferences and so forth. It would not be information collected in team meetings.  We need an owner to take on cataloguing the information. Gary and Phil volunteered to set up a survey.  The thinking is that we could disseminate the survey at the Collaboration Summit (Jack volunteered to make up business size cards to hand out), talk to the LF about disseminating to members and other possible avenues.<br /><br /> <br />Creation of Whitepapers<br /><br />We discussed the creation of a consumers and producers guide to SPDX. Seems these are sorely missing and would help people better understand SPDX. They could start as white papers and then evolve. It was also discussed whether an umbrella document on the benefits of SPDX to sit over those would be helpful as well. Seems like it.  Mark Gisi was going to check on whether he could contribute something to that. Need to find owners for the consumer and producers guide to get them written.<br /><br /> <br />Other Business<br /><br />In addition to discussing the priorities we talked about having an Educational class on SPDX at the collaboration summit. Mark Gisi took an action to look into creation of a session. Would be slotted for 4:30 on Tuesday at the Summit and a chance for people to come in and learn about SPDX and/or share information on experiences.<br /><br /> <strong><br /></strong></p>	+	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mark Gisi</p><p>Gary O'Neall</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p><strong><br /></strong></p><p>We discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. It was proposed to concentrate on the following:<br /><br />1.      Gathering input on SPDX<br /><br />2.      Creation of white papers/guidelines on Consuming and Producing SPDX license information.<br /><br /> <br />Gathering Input on SPDX<br /><br />It was discussed that we do get feedback on SPDX but have never collected it and turned it into actionable requirements in some cases (e.g. data collected from sessions held at the LF Compliance Summit, etc). It would be good for the business team to become the focal point for collecting this type of feedback, cataloguing it and then passing it on to the appropriate teams to look into. The thinking is that the information would be from anonymous sources (unless otherwise stated).  Potential sources of information could be surveys, feedback sessions held at conferences and so forth. It would not be information collected in team meetings.  We need an owner to take on cataloguing the information. Gary and Phil volunteered to set up a survey.  The thinking is that we could disseminate the survey at the Collaboration Summit (Jack volunteered to make up business size cards to hand out), talk to the LF about disseminating to members and other possible avenues.<br /><br /> <br />Creation of Whitepapers<br /><br />We discussed the creation of a consumers and producers guide to SPDX. Seems these are sorely missing and would help people better understand SPDX. They could start as white papers and then evolve. It was also discussed whether an umbrella document on the benefits of SPDX to sit over those would be helpful as well. Seems like it.  Mark Gisi was going to check on whether he could contribute something to that. Need to find owners for the consumer and producers guide to get them written.<br /><br /> <br />Other Business<br /><br />In addition to discussing the priorities we talked about having an Educational class on SPDX at the collaboration summit. Mark Gisi took an action to look into creation of a session. Would be slotted for 4:30 on Tuesday at the Summit and a chance for people to come in and learn about SPDX and/or share information on experiences.<br /><br /> <strong><br /></strong></p>

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 13 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary O'Neall</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p><strong><br /></strong></p><p~~><strong~~>We discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. It was proposed to concentrate on the following:<br /><br />1.      Gathering input on SPDX<br /><br />2.      Creation of white papers/guidelines on Consuming and Producing SPDX license information.<br /><br /> <br />Gathering Input on SPDX<br /><br />It was discussed that we do get feedback on SPDX but have never collected it and turned it into actionable requirements in some cases (e.g. data collected from sessions held at the LF Compliance Summit, etc). It would be good for the business team to become the focal point for collecting this type of feedback, cataloguing it and then passing it on to the appropriate teams to look into. The thinking is that the information would be from anonymous sources (unless otherwise stated).  Potential sources of information could be surveys, feedback sessions held at conferences and so forth. It would not be information collected in team meetings.  We need an owner to take on cataloguing the information. Gary and Phil volunteered to set up a survey.  The thinking is that we could disseminate the survey at the Collaboration Summit (Jack volunteered to make up business size cards to hand out), talk to the LF about disseminating to members and other possible avenues.<br /><br /> <br />Creation of Whitepapers<br /><br />We discussed the creation of a consumers and producers guide to SPDX. Seems these are sorely missing and would help people better understand SPDX. They could start as white papers and then evolve. It was also discussed whether an umbrella document on the benefits of SPDX to sit over those would be helpful as well. Seems like it.  Mark Gisi was going to check on whether he could contribute something to that. Need to find owners for the consumer and producers guide to get them written.<br /><br /> <br />Other Business<br /><br />In addition to discussing the priorities we talked about having an Educational class on SPDX at the collaboration summit. Mark Gisi took an action to look into creation of a session. Would be slotted for 4:30 on Tuesday at the Summit and a chance for people to come in and learn about SPDX and/or share information on experiences.<br /><br /> <br /></strong></p>	+	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary O'Neall</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p><strong><br /></strong></p><p>We discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. It was proposed to concentrate on the following:<br /><br />1.      Gathering input on SPDX<br /><br />2.      Creation of white papers/guidelines on Consuming and Producing SPDX license information.<br /><br /> <br />Gathering Input on SPDX<br /><br />It was discussed that we do get feedback on SPDX but have never collected it and turned it into actionable requirements in some cases (e.g. data collected from sessions held at the LF Compliance Summit, etc). It would be good for the business team to become the focal point for collecting this type of feedback, cataloguing it and then passing it on to the appropriate teams to look into. The thinking is that the information would be from anonymous sources (unless otherwise stated).  Potential sources of information could be surveys, feedback sessions held at conferences and so forth. It would not be information collected in team meetings.  We need an owner to take on cataloguing the information. Gary and Phil volunteered to set up a survey.  The thinking is that we could disseminate the survey at the Collaboration Summit (Jack volunteered to make up business size cards to hand out), talk to the LF about disseminating to members and other possible avenues.<br /><br /> <br />Creation of Whitepapers<br /><br />We discussed the creation of a consumers and producers guide to SPDX. Seems these are sorely missing and would help people better understand SPDX. They could start as white papers and then evolve. It was also discussed whether an umbrella document on the benefits of SPDX to sit over those would be helpful as well. Seems like it.  Mark Gisi was going to check on whether he could contribute something to that. Need to find owners for the consumer and producers guide to get them written.<br /><br /> <br />Other Business<br /><br />In addition to discussing the priorities we talked about having an Educational class on SPDX at the collaboration summit. Mark Gisi took an action to look into creation of a session. Would be slotted for 4:30 on Tuesday at the Summit and a chance for people to come in and learn about SPDX and/or share information on experiences.<br /><br /> <strong><br /></strong></p>

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 13 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary O'Neall</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p>	+	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary O'Neall</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p><strong><br /></strong></p><p><strong>We discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. It was proposed to concentrate on the following:<br /><br />1.      Gathering input on SPDX<br /><br />2.      Creation of white papers/guidelines on Consuming and Producing SPDX license information.<br /><br /> <br />Gathering Input on SPDX<br /><br />It was discussed that we do get feedback on SPDX but have never collected it and turned it into actionable requirements in some cases (e.g. data collected from sessions held at the LF Compliance Summit, etc). It would be good for the business team to become the focal point for collecting this type of feedback, cataloguing it and then passing it on to the appropriate teams to look into. The thinking is that the information would be from anonymous sources (unless otherwise stated).  Potential sources of information could be surveys, feedback sessions held at conferences and so forth. It would not be information collected in team meetings.  We need an owner to take on cataloguing the information. Gary and Phil volunteered to set up a survey.  The thinking is that we could disseminate the survey at the Collaboration Summit (Jack volunteered to make up business size cards to hand out), talk to the LF about disseminating to members and other possible avenues.<br /><br /> <br />Creation of Whitepapers<br /><br />We discussed the creation of a consumers and producers guide to SPDX. Seems these are sorely missing and would help people better understand SPDX. They could start as white papers and then evolve. It was also discussed whether an umbrella document on the benefits of SPDX to sit over those would be helpful as well. Seems like it.  Mark Gisi was going to check on whether he could contribute something to that. Need to find owners for the consumer and producers guide to get them written.<br /><br /> <br />Other Business<br /><br />In addition to discussing the priorities we talked about having an Educational class on SPDX at the collaboration summit. Mark Gisi took an action to look into creation of a session. Would be slotted for 4:30 on Tuesday at the Summit and a chance for people to come in and learn about SPDX and/or share information on experiences.<br /><br /> <br /></strong></p>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary O'Neall</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
+<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary O'Neall</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p>
- <w:WordDocument>
-  <w:View>Normal</w:View>
-  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
-  <w:PunctuationKerning/>
-  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
-  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
-  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
-  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
-  <w:Compatibility>
-   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
-   <w:SnapToGridInCell/>
-   <w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
-   <w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
-   <w:DontGrowAutofit/>
-   <w:UseFELayout/>
-  </w:Compatibility>
-  <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
- </w:WordDocument>
-</xml><![endif]-->

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
    <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
   </w:WordDocument>
-</xml><![endif]--><p>We discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. It was proposed to concentrate on the following:</p><p style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">1.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span>Gathering input on SPDX</p><p style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">2.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span>Creation of white papers/guidelines on Consuming and Producing SPDX license information.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Gathering Input on SPDX</p><p>It was discussed that we do get feedback on SPDX but have never collected it and turned it into actionable requirements in some cases (e.g. data collected from sessions held at the LF Compliance Summit, etc). It would be good for the business team to become the focal point for collecting this type of feedback, cataloguing it and then passing it on to the appropriate teams to look into. The thinking is that the information would be from anonymous sources (unless otherwise stated).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Potential sources of information could be surveys, feedback sessions held at conferences and so forth. It would not be information collected in team meetings. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;</span>We need an owner to take on cataloguing the information. Gary and Phil volunteered to set up a survey. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;</span>The thinking is that we could disseminate the survey at the Collaboration Summit (Jack volunteered to make up business size cards to hand out), talk to the LF about disseminating to members and other possible avenues.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Creation of Whitepapers</p><p>We discussed the creation of a consumers and producers guide to SPDX. Seems these are sorely missing and would help people better understand SPDX. They could start as white papers and then evolve. It was also discussed whether an umbrella document on the benefits of SPDX to sit over those would be helpful as well. Seems like it. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp;</span>Mark Gisi was going to check on whether he could contribute something to that. Need to find owners for the consumer and producers guide to get them written.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Other Business</p><p>In addition to discussing the priorities we talked about having an Educational class on SPDX at the collaboration summit. Mark Gisi took an action to look into creation of a session. Would be slotted for 4:30 on Tuesday at the Summit and a chance for people to come in and learn about SPDX and/or share information on experiences.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
+</xml><![endif]-->
- <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
- </w:LatentStyles>
-</xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object
- classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object>
-<style>
-st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
-</style>
-<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
-<style>
- /* Style Definitions */
- table.MsoNormalTable
-	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
-	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
-	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
-	mso-style-noshow:yes;
-	mso-style-parent:"";
-	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
-	mso-para-margin:0in;
-	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
-	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
-	font-size:10.0pt;
-	font-family:"Times New Roman";
-	mso-ansi-language:#0400;
-	mso-fareast-language:#0400;
-	mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
-</style>
-<![endif]--><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 13 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p> </p><p>1. 2013 Priorities</p><p> </p><p>~~Discussed 2013 Priorities~~ for the business team. ~~Severak items had been considered~~ and it was ~~decided~~ to ~~focus~~ on the ~~following activities~~:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>	+	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary O'Neall</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p> </p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
		+	<w:WordDocument>
		+	<w:View>Normal</w:View>
		+	<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
		+	<w:PunctuationKerning/>
		+	<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
		+	<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
		+	<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
		+	<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
		+	<w:Compatibility>
		+	<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
		+	<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
		+	<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
		+	<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
		+	<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
		+	<w:UseFELayout/>
		+	</w:Compatibility>
		+	<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
		+	</w:WordDocument>
		+	</xml><![endif]--><p> </p><p>We discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. It was proposed to concentrate on the following:</p><p> </p><p style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">1.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">      </span></span></span>Gathering input on SPDX</p><p> </p><p style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.25in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in;"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;">2.<span style="font: 7.0pt 'Times New Roman';">      </span></span></span>Creation of white papers/guidelines on Consuming and Producing SPDX license information.</p><p> </p><p>Gathering Input on SPDX</p><p> </p><p>It was discussed that we do get feedback on SPDX but have never collected it and turned it into actionable requirements in some cases (e.g. data collected from sessions held at the LF Compliance Summit, etc). It would be good for the business team to become the focal point for collecting this type of feedback, cataloguing it and then passing it on to the appropriate teams to look into. The thinking is that the information would be from anonymous sources (unless otherwise stated).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Potential sources of information could be surveys, feedback sessions held at conferences and so forth. It would not be information collected in team meetings. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We need an owner to take on cataloguing the information. Gary and Phil volunteered to set up a survey. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The thinking is that we could disseminate the survey at the Collaboration Summit (Jack volunteered to make up business size cards to hand out), talk to the LF about disseminating to members and other possible avenues.</p><p> </p><p>Creation of Whitepapers</p><p> </p><p>We discussed the creation of a consumers and producers guide to SPDX. Seems these are sorely missing and would help people better understand SPDX. They could start as white papers and then evolve. It was also discussed whether an umbrella document on the benefits of SPDX to sit over those would be helpful as well. Seems like it. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Mark Gisi was going to check on whether he could contribute something to that. Need to find owners for the consumer and producers guide to get them written.</p><p> </p><p>Other Business</p><p> </p><p>In addition to discussing the priorities we talked about having an Educational class on SPDX at the collaboration summit. Mark Gisi took an action to look into creation of a session. Would be slotted for 4:30 on Tuesday at the Summit and a chance for people to come in and learn about SPDX and/or share information on experiences.</p><p> </p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
		+	<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156">
		+	</w:LatentStyles>
		+	</xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object
		+	classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object>
		+	<style>
		+	st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
		+	</style>
		+	<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
		+	<style>
		+	/* Style Definitions */
		+	table.MsoNormalTable
		+	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
		+	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
		+	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
		+	mso-style-noshow:yes;
		+	mso-style-parent:"";
		+	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
		+	mso-para-margin:0in;
		+	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
		+	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
		+	font-size:10.0pt;
		+	font-family:"Times New Roman";
		+	mso-ansi-language:#0400;
		+	mso-fareast-language:#0400;
		+	mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
		+	</style>
		+	<![endif]--><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 13 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary </p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p> </p><p>1. 2013 Priorities</p><p> </p><p>Discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team.</p><p> </p><p> </p>	+	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary</p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p> </p><p>1. 2013 Priorities</p><p> </p><p>Discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team. Severak items had been considered and it was decided to focus on the following activities:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:31, 13 March 2013
Line 1:	Line 1:
−	+	<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Mrk Gisis</p><p>Gary </p><p>Phil Odence</p><p> </p><p><strong>Agenda / Notes</strong></p><p> </p><p>1. 2013 Priorities</p><p> </p><p>Discussed 2013 Priorities for the business team.</p><p> </p><p> </p>